0:03 [SPEAKER_01]: The jury deliberated for three hours, and in those three hours, they reached a verdict that would haunt this case for 150 years. 0:14 [SPEAKER_01]: On August 12, 1876, after 23 days of testimony and 40 witnesses, the 18 men of the coroner 0:30 [SPEAKER_01]: The crowds pressed forward. 0:33 [SPEAKER_01]: The newspapers readied their headlines. 0:36 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence Bravo, Jane Cox, and Dr. James Mambi Gully, waited to learn their fate. 0:45 [SPEAKER_01]: The foreman stood. 0:47 [SPEAKER_01]: The coroner asked if they had reached a verdict. 0:52 [SPEAKER_01]: In the words that followed, 0:58 [SPEAKER_00]: We find that Charles Bravo was willfully murdered by the administration of Tata Ametic, but there is not sufficient evidence to fix the guilt upon any person or persons. 1:12 [SPEAKER_01]: Murder. 1:14 [SPEAKER_01]: No, murderer. 1:17 [SPEAKER_01]: hello friend, welcome back to Fowlplay. 1:22 [SPEAKER_01]: I'm Shane Waters, and this is the final episode of our season on the ballam mystery, the poisoning of Charles Bravo and April 1876. 1:33 [SPEAKER_01]: Over four episodes, we followed this case from Charles's arrival at the priori through his three-day death. 1:46 [SPEAKER_01]: Tonight, we examine what the jury's verdict meant, and why it proved so unsatisfying. 1:54 [SPEAKER_01]: We analyze the four suspects, Florence, Miss Cox, Dr. Gully, and Charles himself. 2:03 [SPEAKER_01]: Waying the evidence for and against each, we follow their faith after the inquest 2:12 [SPEAKER_01]: and we confront the question that has never been definitively answered. 2:18 [SPEAKER_01]: Who killed Charles Bravo? 2:22 [SPEAKER_01]: This is not a case with a tidy ending. 2:25 [SPEAKER_01]: There will be no dramatic reveal, no smoking gun, no confession that ties everything together. 2:34 [SPEAKER_01]: What we have instead is something rare, 2:40 [SPEAKER_01]: a genuine mystery that has resisted solution for a century and a half. 2:50 [SPEAKER_02]: The verdict was unprecedented in English legal history, murder by person or persons unknown. 2:57 [SPEAKER_02]: The jury had concluded that Charles Bravo was intentionally killed, not suicide, not accident, but deliberate poisoning. 3:06 [SPEAKER_02]: Yet they could not or would not name the killer. 3:10 [SPEAKER_02]: This was not an acquittal. 3:13 [SPEAKER_02]: Lawrence Bravo, Jane Cox and Dr. Gully walked free, not because they were found innocent, but because the evidence against each was insufficient for a criminal prosecution. 3:24 [SPEAKER_02]: The cloud of suspicion would follow all three for the rest of their lives. 3:29 [SPEAKER_02]: The coroner William Carter accepted the verdict without comment. 3:34 [SPEAKER_02]: The attorney general, Sir John Hoker, announced that no further proceedings would be initiated. 3:41 [SPEAKER_02]: The case of Charles Bravo, legally speaking, was closed. 3:46 [SPEAKER_02]: But closure is not the same as Resolution. 3:49 [SPEAKER_02]: The newspapers erupted. 3:51 [SPEAKER_02]: Editorials condemned the verdict as cowardice. 3:54 [SPEAKER_02]: The jury had named a murder, but refused to name a murderer. 3:59 [SPEAKER_02]: Letters flooded the papers demanding that Florence, Mrs. Cox, or Dr. Gully, be charged. 4:05 [SPEAKER_02]: The public which had followed every salacious detail of the inquest felt cheated of the ending they had expected. 4:12 [SPEAKER_02]: And Charles Bravo's family was devastated. 4:15 [SPEAKER_02]: His mother, Mary Bravo, had sat through every day of testimony. 4:20 [SPEAKER_02]: She had heard a sun's reputation defended and his wife's reputation destroyed. 4:26 [SPEAKER_02]: She had hoped desperately that someone would be held accountable for his death. 4:30 [SPEAKER_02]: Instead, she received a verdict that confirmed what she already believed. 4:35 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles was murdered. 4:38 [SPEAKER_02]: while denying her the justice of seeing his killer punished. 4:42 [SPEAKER_02]: The Bravo family hired private investigators. 4:45 [SPEAKER_02]: They pursued additional evidence for years. 4:47 [SPEAKER_02]: They never found anything that would change the outcome. 4:51 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles Bravo was murdered, and his murderer escaped. 4:58 [SPEAKER_01]: But a success in each suspect is the jury must have examined them. 5:04 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence Bravo, 31 years old, widow of the deceased, but a fishery of his entire estate. 5:15 [SPEAKER_01]: The case against her begins with motive. 5:20 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence was unhappy in her marriage. 5:23 [SPEAKER_01]: Charles controlled her money. 5:26 [SPEAKER_01]: The fortune she had inherited from her first husband, 5:30 [SPEAKER_01]: He demanded she dismiss Mrs. Cox, her closest companion. 5:37 [SPEAKER_01]: He knew about her affair with Dr. Goli and held it over her. 5:43 [SPEAKER_01]: She had told friends that marriage to Charles was a mistake. 5:49 [SPEAKER_01]: She had written letters expressing regret. 5:53 [SPEAKER_01]: She had, by multiple accounts, cried more in four months of marriage than she had in years of widowhood. 6:02 [SPEAKER_01]: And when Charles died, Florence got everything. 6:07 [SPEAKER_01]: Her freedom, her fortune, her future. 6:12 [SPEAKER_01]: The case against her continues with opportunity. 6:16 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence was present at the primary on the night of April 18th, 1876. 6:21 [SPEAKER_01]: She had access to the Antimony kept in the stables. 6:26 [SPEAKER_01]: She could have introduced it into Charles' water without anyone noticing. 6:33 [SPEAKER_01]: But here the prosecutions case begins to falter. 6:41 [SPEAKER_01]: Mrs. Cox was present. 6:44 [SPEAKER_01]: The servants handled the food, multiple people, and opportunity. 6:50 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence was merely one of them. 6:54 [SPEAKER_01]: More significantly, the Antimone appeared to have been added to the water in Charles' bedroom after dinner. 7:02 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence retired to her own room that evening with a sick, 7:08 [SPEAKER_01]: If she poisoned the water, she would have had to enter Charles' room without being seen by Mrs. Cox or the Servants, possible but not proven. 7:21 [SPEAKER_01]: The final problem with the case against Florence is psychological. 7:28 [SPEAKER_01]: She had endured a disastrous first marriage to Alexander Ricardo, 7:34 [SPEAKER_01]: an alcoholic who squandered her money and died young. 7:39 [SPEAKER_01]: She had fought for her independence. 7:43 [SPEAKER_01]: She had taken a lover on her own terms. 7:47 [SPEAKER_01]: She had agreed to marry Charles only after he promised to let her keep her companion. 7:54 [SPEAKER_01]: And some control over her finances 7:57 [SPEAKER_01]: with such a woman having finally achieved security, risk everything on a murder that could have sent her to the gallows, which she choose poison, a method that invited suspicion, when she could have simply waited for a divorce or separation. 8:19 [SPEAKER_01]: The jury could not say yes with confidence. 8:25 [SPEAKER_02]: Jane Cannon Cox, 45 years old, companion and housekeeper, the only person who claimed Charles confessed to suicide. 8:35 [SPEAKER_02]: The case against Mrs. Cox is perhaps the most compelling of the four suspects. 8:40 [SPEAKER_02]: She had motive. 8:41 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles wanted her dismissed. 8:43 [SPEAKER_02]: He had made his feelings clear to Florence. 8:46 [SPEAKER_02]: Mrs. Cox must go. 8:48 [SPEAKER_02]: If Laurence yielded to her husband's demands, Mrs. Cox would lose everything, her position, her income, the security that supported her three sons. 8:58 [SPEAKER_02]: She had opportunity. 9:00 [SPEAKER_02]: Mrs. Cox was present at evening. 9:02 [SPEAKER_02]: She was the last person to interact with Charles before his collapse. 9:06 [SPEAKER_02]: She was alone with him in the sick room and he allegedly confessed. 9:09 [SPEAKER_02]: And, she had means. 9:12 [SPEAKER_02]: The coachman, George Griffith, testified that Mrs. Cox had asked him about the unto many kept in the stables. 9:18 [SPEAKER_02]: She knew where it was stored, she knew what it could do. 9:23 [SPEAKER_02]: The confession story is the crux of the case against her. 9:26 [SPEAKER_02]: I took poison, don't tell Florence. 9:29 [SPEAKER_02]: Five words had by no one else. 9:31 [SPEAKER_02]: that conveniently shifted suspicion from murder to suicide. 9:35 [SPEAKER_02]: If Charles had made no such confession, if Mrs Cox invented it to protect herself or Florence, then she was either the killer or complicit in covering for the killer. 9:47 [SPEAKER_02]: The cross-examination at the second-ing quest exposed weaknesses in her story. 9:52 [SPEAKER_02]: The house-made Mary Ann Keber heard nothing. 9:56 [SPEAKER_02]: The doctors who questioned Charles directly received no confession. 10:01 [SPEAKER_02]: Only Mrs. Cox, alone, heard Charles take responsibility for his own death. 10:07 [SPEAKER_02]: But the case against Mrs. Cox also has problems. 10:11 [SPEAKER_02]: She had served Florence loyally for years. 10:14 [SPEAKER_02]: She had helped with the abortion keeping Florence's darkest secret. 10:18 [SPEAKER_02]: The two women were bound together by knowledge that could destroy them both. 10:22 [SPEAKER_02]: If Mrs. Cox wanted to protect Florence, she did not need to commit murder. 10:28 [SPEAKER_02]: She simply needed to continue her silence, and poisoning Charles created enormous risk. 10:35 [SPEAKER_02]: If detected Mrs. Cox would face the gallows. 10:39 [SPEAKER_02]: If suspected she would lose her position anyway. 10:42 [SPEAKER_02]: The very outcome she feared, unemployment and poverty would result from the investigation of the crime. 10:49 [SPEAKER_02]: Well, she desperate enough to tie that risk. 10:53 [SPEAKER_02]: The jury could not say yes with confidence. 10:58 [SPEAKER_01]: Dr. James Manbegully, 68 years old, Florence's former lover, the father of the child she never had, the case against Dr. Gully begins with motive, or does it? 11:14 [SPEAKER_01]: he had been cast aside. 11:17 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence had ended their relationship to Mary Charles. 11:21 [SPEAKER_01]: She had stopped seeing him, stopped writing to him, stopped allowing him into her life. 11:29 [SPEAKER_01]: A man who had given up everything for her, his reputation, his marriage, his standing and society, had been abandoned. 11:40 [SPEAKER_01]: jealousy, revenge, the elimination of a rival who had taken what Goli wants possessed. 11:49 [SPEAKER_01]: Accept that Goli's testimony and the evidence from the inquest suggests a different story. 11:57 [SPEAKER_01]: He had accepted Florence's decision. 12:00 [SPEAKER_01]: He had wished her well in her marriage. 12:03 [SPEAKER_01]: He had not attempted to contact her or interfere in her new life. 12:10 [SPEAKER_01]: The passionate affair had cooled into something like resignation. 12:16 [SPEAKER_01]: The case against Goli continues, it means, as a physician, he knew precisely how much Antimony would kill a man. 12:25 [SPEAKER_01]: He understood poisons and their effects. 12:29 [SPEAKER_01]: He could have obtained tartaramedic without difficulty. 12:33 [SPEAKER_01]: It was a common medical substance. 12:36 [SPEAKER_01]: But Goli was not at the primary on April 18th, 1876. 12:43 [SPEAKER_01]: He was at his home and street him miles away. 12:46 [SPEAKER_01]: If he poisoned Charles Bravo, he did so through an intermediary. 12:53 [SPEAKER_01]: Most likely, this is Cox. 12:56 [SPEAKER_01]: This leads to the conspiracy theory that has persisted for 150 years, Dr. Golly and Mrs. Cox working together, murdered Charles to free Florence from her marriage and restore the status quo. 13:14 [SPEAKER_01]: The theory has surface appeal. 13:17 [SPEAKER_01]: Mrs. Cox had access, Goli had knowledge, both had reasons to want Charles gone and Mrs. Cox confession story could have been designed to cover for both of them. 13:32 [SPEAKER_01]: But there is no evidence of coordination between them. 13:36 [SPEAKER_01]: No letters, no meetings, no witnesses who saw them together in the weeks before Charles's death. 13:45 [SPEAKER_01]: The conspiracy, if it existed, left no trace. 13:50 [SPEAKER_01]: What a 68-year-old physician, at the end of a distinguished career, risk the gallows 14:01 [SPEAKER_01]: would he trust his life to Mrs. Cox' discretion? 14:06 [SPEAKER_01]: Would he commit murder, knowing that suspicion would inevitably fall on those closest to the victim? 14:15 [SPEAKER_01]: The jury could not say yes with confidence. 14:20 [SPEAKER_02]: The false suspect is Charles Bravo himself, which is Coss' testimony, if believed, supports suicide. 14:29 [SPEAKER_02]: I took poison, don't tell Florence. 14:31 [SPEAKER_02]: A man who discovered something so devastating about his wife's past, that he chose death over continuing the marriage. 14:39 [SPEAKER_02]: but what could Charles have discovered in April 1876 that he did not already know in January when he married Florence? 14:47 [SPEAKER_02]: He knew about Dr. Gully, Florence had confessed the affair before their wedding. 14:52 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles had accepted it, grudgingly perhaps, but he had married her anyway. 14:57 [SPEAKER_02]: In you about Florence's past, the gossip, the scandal, the questions about her first husband. 15:03 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles was a barrister. 15:05 [SPEAKER_02]: He investigated matters for a living. 15:07 [SPEAKER_02]: He would not have married Florence without knowing what he was getting into. 15:12 [SPEAKER_02]: The suicide theory requires Charles to have learned something new, something so terrible that deaths seem preferable to living with the knowledge. 15:20 [SPEAKER_02]: What could that have been? 15:23 [SPEAKER_02]: The abortion? 15:24 [SPEAKER_02]: If Charles discovered that Florence had terminated a pregnancy, Dr. Gully's child, it might have shattered whatever illusions he still held about his wife. 15:34 [SPEAKER_02]: Victoria's Society regarded abortion as both criminal and monstrous. 15:39 [SPEAKER_02]: A woman who had done such a thing was beyond redemption in the eyes of many men. 15:44 [SPEAKER_02]: But there is no evidence that Charles learned about the abortion before his death. 15:48 [SPEAKER_02]: No confrontation, no letters, no witness who heard a McEuse Florence of this particular sin. 15:55 [SPEAKER_02]: The Suicide Theory also conflicts with Charles's behavior in his final days. 16:00 [SPEAKER_02]: He did not leave a note, he did not settle as a first, he did not say goodbye to his family, and the amount of antimony in his system enough to kill three men, suggest either 16:14 [SPEAKER_02]: or a miscalculation by someone who did not know the proper dose. 16:18 [SPEAKER_02]: Most damning is the timing. 16:21 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles has taken out a substantial life insurance policy shortly before his death. 16:26 [SPEAKER_02]: If he committed suicide, that policy would be void. 16:31 [SPEAKER_02]: His mother and stepfather would receive nothing. 16:34 [SPEAKER_02]: Charles, who was devoted to his family, 16:43 [SPEAKER_01]: For suspects, four possible murderers, and no way to know with certainty, which one, if any, killed Charles Bravo. 16:57 [SPEAKER_01]: The aftermath of the inquest scattered the suspects to different fates. 17:03 [SPEAKER_01]: Florence Bravo sold the priory, immediately. 17:07 [SPEAKER_01]: She could not bear to live in the house, where her husband had died, and her reputation had been destroyed. 17:16 [SPEAKER_01]: She retreated to South Sea, a quiet seaside town, where she lived under an assumed name. 17:24 [SPEAKER_01]: She never remarried. 17:27 [SPEAKER_01]: She drank heavily. 17:32 [SPEAKER_01]: On September 17th, 1878, just two years after Charles's death. 17:39 [SPEAKER_01]: Floyd's died of an alcohol-related illness. 17:44 [SPEAKER_01]: she was 33 years old. 17:47 [SPEAKER_01]: Jane Cannon Cox returned to Jamaica, or she had relatives. 17:52 [SPEAKER_01]: She lived quietly for decades, but far from the scandal that had consumed her. 17:59 [SPEAKER_01]: She never spoke publicly about the case again. 18:03 [SPEAKER_01]: She died in 1913, taking whatever secret she held to her grave. 18:09 [SPEAKER_01]: Dr. James Mambicoli retreated to Malvern where he had built his reputation. 18:17 [SPEAKER_01]: His practice was finished. 18:19 [SPEAKER_01]: His name had become synonymous with scandal. 18:23 [SPEAKER_01]: He died in 1883, a 75, a ruined man who had lost everything, for a love that ended in tragedy. 18:35 [SPEAKER_01]: In Charles Bravo lies in Norwood Cemetery, in a grave that has stood for 150 years. 18:43 [SPEAKER_01]: The man who might have named his killer, if he had only spoken clearly. 18:50 [SPEAKER_01]: The man whose silence has fueled a mystery that refuses to be solved. 18:58 [SPEAKER_01]: This case reaches its 150th anniversary, this April. 19:04 [SPEAKER_01]: In 1876, Charles Bravo drank poisoned water and died three days later. 19:12 [SPEAKER_01]: In 2026, we are no closer to knowing who killed him than the jury that heard 23 days of testimony. 19:22 [SPEAKER_01]: Was it Florence desperate to escape an unhappy marriage? 19:27 [SPEAKER_01]: Was it Miss Cox fighting to preserve her position and perhaps her freedom? 19:33 [SPEAKER_01]: Was it Dr. Golly seeking revenge on the man who had taken his lover? 19:40 [SPEAKER_01]: or was it Charles himself, choosing death over a truth he could not bear. 19:47 [SPEAKER_01]: The evidence points in every direction, and in no direction. 19:54 [SPEAKER_01]: The truth, whatever it was, died with the people who knew it. 20:01 [SPEAKER_01]: What remains is a mystery, genuinely unsolved, genuinely, unknowable, and perhaps that is the most honest ending we can offer. 20:14 [SPEAKER_01]: Not every case has a solution, not every killer is caught. 20:20 [SPEAKER_01]: Not every victim receives justice. 20:24 [SPEAKER_01]: The ballam mystery reminds us that history does not always tie up neatly. 20:30 [SPEAKER_01]: Sometimes the questions remain questions forever. 20:37 [SPEAKER_01]: Thank you for joining me on this season of Fowl Play. 20:41 [SPEAKER_01]: This has been the ballam mystery, the poisoning of Charles Bravo in 1876. 20:46 [SPEAKER_01]: Until next time, good night,
Show full transcript (209 segments)